|
Understanding Japanese history is difficult
for a number of reason. First of all, early Japanese history
(which was for centuries "taught" and believed) is simply not true. More
about that later. Second, Japanese historians, like most historians, are fond on breaking history
into periods, but their choice of names rarely captures the essence of the period. At first I thought
this was the result of the Japanese proclivity for not being straight
forward. Later I realized that it was merely structural rule being
followed - naming periods of imperial control after the various imperial
family lines and naming the periods of military control after the
location of the dictators and their governments. Third, people
often look a countries history without looking either regionally or
globally to understand the context in which the history is happening and
where or not what is being said makes any sense or is believable.
With Japanese history, it is a popular misconception that Japan somehow
existed in isolation until US admiral Perry forced the country to open
up. Simply untrue. Japan was has a well documented history
of 1500 years of interaction with China starting with the Sui Dynasty in
and about 600 AD, a very close but brief experimental relationship with
the Portuguese and their version of Christianity in the late 1500s, and an "exclusive
trading partnership" with the Dutch for almost 250 year prior to the
arrival of Perry. This an other popular misconception about Japan
make it difficult to organize thought about what was really going on.
For instance, it is highly likely that the the Japanese version of the
"European arquebus" was the most advanced most advance handheld firearms
in the worlds in 1560. And you thought samurai just carried the
just carried swords! There was a reason the British, French,
Portuguese had little leverage over the Japanese with regard trade and
immigration policy and it was more than just the shear number of
samurai. Hideyoshi's army that went to Korea in the late 1500s was
5 times the largest standing army in Europe and Japanese new firearm
technology (design and manufacturing) and fighting techniques played an
important part in many of the decisive victories there.
Anyway, back to the point. Not being a
historian nor Japanese, I feel no need to follow convention nor am
invested in perpetuating any particular version of history other than
the one I believe is most likely. Hence, I break down
Japanese History into 5 periods - sort of based on very macro / "big
picture" themes. While the names I have given them could likely be
improved, if you simply read the brief summary below, my guess is that
you will have "a clearer" picture of Japanese history than most
Japanese. Hence, my "big picture" breakdown of
Japanese history as follows: |
| |
-
Prior 593
("Pre Buddhism")
While much of Japan's early history was fabricated, it
is easy to make too much of these lies. Japan is not
the first nor last culture to find it convenient to lie
about the past. Heck, these days counties even lie
about the present! Also, as many an individual has found out
for themselves, when so much of what has been said is
untrue, how and when does one start telling then truth.
Anyway, the important point is that in 593 AD, Japan was
still just obscure group of island relatively far from the
"middle nation" - China - and significantly less populated. Japan was not the end of the earth, but you could see if
from there. China on the other hand laid claim to the
world largest city Xi'an, the capital of the Sui Emperor,
whom after after nearly four centuries of political
fragmentation, unified China in 589 AD. And
while the Chinese and the peoples of the Korean peninsula
had been fighting for at least a thousand of years prior, the Japanese
culture was really only "getting rolling" around
200 to 300 AD after the import of "modern agricultural" and
"metallurgy" technique from China and Korea that resulted in
explosive population growth in and around "central Japan" -
Kansai This may comes as a surprise to many whom
actually think Japan is an ancient culture - not true. My thoughts on this period are currently
being rewritten and will be available again soon.
While not directly involved (at all), two
important wars were occurring in the region towards the end
of this period. First was the war of the Baekje and
Silla (peoples the Southern Korean Peninsula) against the
Goguryeo, the very powerful and successful empire occupying
northern Korean peninsula and Manchuria. At his time
the Baekje royal court and king (a practicing Buddhist) was
"very good friends" with Soga family, one of the three most
powerful of the Japanese imperial court families and a
family whose power within the imperial court was rising at a
fast rate. The second
was the Wei Chinese war against the Goguryeo starting in 598
AD. Japan was far away from all this activity
but it is important to understand the context in which local
events were occurring. Anyway, I choose 593 as the end of this period
because it coincides with
the resolution of a major 5 year power struggle within the
imperial court that coincided with the the assassination of
Emperor Sujun (32nd soverign), the "ascension / appointment"
of Empress Suiko (the highly qualified but compromise candidate), the naming of Shōtoku Taishi
as crown prince and regent, and other important changes that
began thereafter. Shōtoku Taishi was pretty
cool dude who was purportedly able to have 12 separate
conversation simultaneously with 12 people and who is
commonly credited with promoting Buddhism throughout Japan.
While much that is said about him is probably not true, what
is true is that as regent, Shōtoku Taishi
controlled the
33rd imperial court of Empress Suiko and implemented four
very China oriented policies. First, was the official
recognition of Buddhism as a national religion in 594 AD
with the "Flourishing Three Treasures Edict", second was the
beginning diplomatic
relations with the Sui Emperor of China. Third, in the
year 603 AD, the imperial court
adopted the same 12 level "merit based ranking system" use
in China for classifying it's members. and fourth, the
adoption in 604 AD of a seventeen-article "constitution"
which was a highly Buddhist document that focus on on the
morals and virtues that were to be expected of government
officials and the emperor's subjects to ensure a smooth
running of the state. Hence, 593 AD marks
(a) the
end of the period where Shinto (an the power family backing
it) would no longer have a
monopoly on religion, (b) the first of many Buddhism rulers,
(c) the beginning of more organize rule of the country using
Chinese's methods and practices.
-
Period of Imperial Rule
using "the Chinese Model" (593
to1185). While historically most Japanese have not
seen it this way, this period distantly different from the
prior period in that the imperial court essentially adopted
the "Chinese way" of ruling and administering people.
Hence, even though Buddhism started in India, when you read
about "the spread of Buddhism in Japan", you must realize that this
phrase is a "code word" for the spread of "Chinese
culture"
and methods for controlling people. Remember, that
history has proven that it is very difficult to control
people unless one has a religion that they can give the
people that work in concert with "the government".
Anyway, 600AD was the beginning of an almost 600 year period
of imperial rule where the military and civil government is
directly control by the powerful families of the imperial court ("and
the emperor") using very effective techniques imported from
China. During this time, the imperial court
implemented, adopted all the foundational Buddhist doctrine
at the beginning of the period (noted above), Chinese as an
official court language, the Taika Reform Edicts of 645, and reorganized the
government and the penal code in accordance with the Chinese
administrative structure - the Ritsuryou defines both a
criminal code (Ritsu) and an administrative code (Ryou).
The term Nihon began to be used in his period and uses the
Chinese kanji used for this Japanese word means "the origin of the sun"
which makes sense only if you are "waking up in China." The period end
with a war over imperial succession - the well know tales
of the
Genpei War between two powerful families of the imperial
court - Minamoto (Genji) and the Taira (Heike).
The war against the Taira was
lead by Minamoto Yoritomo and resulted in the dramatic destruction and death of many of the
powerful imperial court families and the death six-year-old Emperor Antoku at the hands of Minamoto Yoritomo's
often hailed
brilliant half brother
Minamoto Yoshitsune.
-
Period of Military Rule
(1185 to 1868). Period where the civil government
and administration is controlled by the military leaders and
not the families of the imperial court, nor for the matter
the emperor.
This period has 4 distinct grouping 1) beginning with Minamoto Yoritomo and
the "Kamakura
(a place) Period", 2) continued with Ashikaga Shoguns - "Muromachi
(a place) Period" 3) the short but important rule of Nobunaga
- Hideyoshi during the "Azuchi-Momoyama (two places) Period"
[also know as the Warring Period or Sengoku Jidai] and 4) ending
after the14 successive ruling Tokugawa shoguns - "Edo (a
place) Period". See
Unequal Treaties write-up for
how this period ended and a good introduction to modern
Japan.
-
Restoration of Imperial
Power,
Evolving Democratic Institutions, and Hijacking of the
Government by the Military (period from 1868 to
1945) Officially beginning with the decisive
defeat of the Tokugawa Shogun's forces January 1868 and
the restoration of rule by the imperial court (Meiji
restoration) and ends with the Japanese surrender during
WW2.
-
Post WWII Government
|
|
|
Note of Period Naming Conventions
During the period from 1185 to 1868,
historians did not name the period after the imperial court, but after
the location of where the military government was established. Hence the Kamakura, Muromachi, and Edo Periods
for the three main military dictatorships as well as Azuchi-Momoyama period, named
after the castle of Oda Nobunaga and Toyotomi Hideyoshi, for their
short but very important transition period. . |